Sector funds vs. ETFs
Commentary: Boosting performance through sector funds
By James Lowell, Fidelity Investor Last Update: 1:04 AM ET Oct. 3, 2003
WATERTOWN, Mass. (FidelityInvestor) --
Sector funds have few fans, but several fanatics. With Fidelity being
far and away the biggest and most experienced player, sporting 41 sector
mutual funds, their decision last month to waive the onerous 3 percent
front-end load was surely good news to fans and fanatics alike.
The move make's Fidelity's Select sector funds extremely competitive
with exchange-traded funds, where the strongest selling point over actively
managed funds was lower cost.
Another key selling point for ETFs, of course, is intra-day trading
flexibility -- but, at the end of the day, I keep my eyes on higher
returns, and believe firmly that active management, even of sector funds,
can make a world of risk- and return-related difference.
It's important to understand, too, that Fidelity sector fund managers
are hell bent on outperforming their sector benchmarks -- since that's
the only way they'll be able to grab the brass ring from a diversified
fund down the road.
Benefits of sector fund investing
Sector funds are among the most misunderstood and misused arrows in
any investor's quiver. But, used correctly, most investors can enhance
their overall portfolio's return through sector funds. And, compared
to trying to pick a handful of stocks on your own, sector funds play
a meaningful diversification role, which will reduce risk.
Diversification is straightforward enough: Most sector funds have 50
or more stocks in their mix, meaning that if one or two stocks go south,
your overall investment can still move north. That diversification also
helps reduce volatility relative to owning a handful of stocks in a
given sector.
Moreover, many sector funds have a lower Beta (less risk) than the S&P
500 (SPX: news, chart, profile): A prime example would be healthcare
sector funds, such as Fidelity Select Healthcare (FSPHX: news, chart,
profile) or Vanguard Specialized Healthcare (VGHCX: news, chart, profile),
that concentrate their assets in major pharmaceuticals, medical equipment
manufacturers, HMOs, and to a greater or lesser extent, biotechnology
stocks.
Less risk, in a necessary long-term growth sector wherein you'll find
a basket of real companies, with real products, real market share and,
yes, real earnings, can be more fulfilling so long as you invest in
reasonable doses.
Before I turn to what I consider a "reasonable dose", there's one caveat
that applies to all sector funds: Sector fund investors have to be right
about the sector. If not, no amount of stellar stock picking on behalf
of the sector fund's manager can save the day.
If, for example, you think that gold is a great sector to invest in,
and the market doesn't agree, the sector and the fund or ETF that concentrates
in it, will go down.
Reasonable doses
If the S&P 500's weighting in technology is 18 percent, and your overall
growth portfolio's weighting in technology is 14 percent, you could
invest in Fidelity Select Technology (FSPTX: news, chart, profile) to
the tune of 4 percent if you wanted to match the market's bias, or 8
percent if you wanted to be moderately overweight technology relative
to the market.
Since technology has already had a significant rally, your portfolio
may be overweight tech already, and underweight healthcare, which has
performed about half as well as the broader market so far this year.
I'd opt for a combination of Fidelity Select Medical Equipment & Systems
(FSMEX: news, chart, profile) and Fidelity Select Pharmaceuticals (FPHAX:
news, chart, profile) in equal doses to increase my growth portfolio's
overall stake to a moderate market overweight.
Why not use Fidelity Select Healthcare or Vanguard Specialized Healthcare?
You could, but both funds own biotech stocks that, like tech, may have
seen the best days of their rally's sun.
Sector fund portfolio
Investors can build a diversified portfolio using sector funds. My current
Fidelity Sector Investor portfolio (which is independently tracked by
Hulberts), is invested in six Fidelity Select funds and one Fidelity
Regional fund: Retailing (FSRPX: news, chart, profile), Industrial Materials
(FSDPX: news, chart, profile), Brokerage (FSLBX: news, chart, profile),
Medical Delivery (FSHCX: news, chart, profile), Networking (FNINX: news,
chart, profile), Wireless (FWRLX: news, chart, profile), and Japan (FJPNX:
news, chart, profile).
This year, this diversified portfolio is up 15.4 percent through the
end of September, according to the Hulbert Financial Digest, vs. a 13.2
percent gain by its benchmark S&P 500 index.
Of course, the year isn't over yet. With that in mind, I'd suggest you
take the time in the next week or two to review your current portfolio
with an eye toward its sector weightings relative to the market.
Sector funds can help you achieve the weightings you think best.
Shorting Selects
Shorting amounts to owning negative shares in a stock, so that one benefits
from declines in prices -- but is likewise hurt by price increases.
Basically, if you have a margin account at a brokerage, and it's not
an IRA or other such tax-deferred retirement account, you can short
stocks or exchange-traded funds.
In general, you can't short a mutual fund. But while Fidelity has rarely
promoted the practice -- which it has allowed off and on since the late
1980s -- within a Fidelity brokerage account, it's possible to short
some of their Select sector funds.
Of Fidelity's 41 Selects, only 11 can be shorted: Automotive (FSAVX:
news, chart, profile), Banking (FSRBX: news, chart, profile), Biotechnology
(FBIOX: news, chart, profile), Energy (FSENX: news, chart, profile),
Environmental (FSLEX: news, chart, profile), Food & Agriculture (FDFAX:
news, chart, profile), Gold (FSAGX: news, chart, profile), Health Care
(FSPHX: news, chart, profile), Medical Delivery (FSHCX: news, chart,
profile), Telecommunications (FSTCX: news, chart, profile), and Utilities
Growth (FSUTX: news, chart, profile).
These were at one time among the largest Select funds, and the most
widely held in brokerage accounts.
The shares have to be held in a brokerage account so that you can legally
"borrow" them and thereby effectively sell shares you don't own; you
return the shares when you buy them back, or "cover" your position,
hopefully at a lower price.
When shorting Fidelity Selects, you won't be charged the regular 0.75
percent redemption fee on purchases held less than 30 days. But you
will pay a normal stock commission at each end of the transaction, regardless
of the time period.
The trade must be done over the phone, not on-line, and the "uptick"
rule does apply. (As with a stock, you can't short a Select while it's
trending downward; in fact, its latest price has to be at least 2 cents
over the previous price.)
If you do want to short sectors, you might want to consider shorting
exchange-traded funds instead of Selects. ETFs offer more sectors and
other types of indexes (by style, exchange, and international); they're
not limited to hourly pricing (unlike the majority of mutual funds,
which price once daily, Select funds ; because they're unmanaged index
funds you know exactly what they hold; and you can even short ETFs on
a downtick -- something you can't do with Selects or individual stocks.
IShares offers the broadest selection of ETFs and a good Web site, www.ishares.com.
Of course, many caveats apply to shorting. Since stocks have unlimited
upside potential, there is no set limit to how much you can lose when
shorting a stock. (And if you don't maintain enough assets in your account,
you may be forced to cover your short at a loss.)
James Lowell edits independent newsletter Fidelity Investor and trading
adviser Fidelity Sector Investor. He's also authored several books on
investing and is chief investment strategist for Adviser Investment
Management.